Spot the big difference

Chinese fishermen whose boat ran aground in Tubbataha.Interphoto. Thanks to Interaksyon

Chinese fishermen whose boat ran aground in Tubbataha.Interphoto. Thanks to Interaksyon


President Aquino is being consistent when he said that the government will not be filing a diplomatic protest against China for the intrusion of a fishing vessel that got stuck in Tubbataha Reef in Sulu Sea, 150 kilometers southeast of Puerto Princesa City in Palawan.

After all, he didn’t also protest to the United States when the minesweeper USS Guardian got stuck and caused extensive damage to the reef which is Marine Protected Area three months ago (Jan. 17). It took the US navy three months remove the 1,300-ton, 68-meter-long Avenger Class minesweeper piece by piece. It was completed last March 30.

Deputy presidential spokesperson Abigail Valte said April 7 that a diplomatic protest against the U.S was “unnecessary” because the superpower has been cooperating with the maritime investigation and has committed to the compensation and rehabilitation of the reef.

Damaged to Tubbataha Reef, which is UNESCO Heritage site, has been placed at P58 million.

Despite a Visiting Forces Agreement between the U.S. and the Philippines which provides the guidelines on the prosecution of any member of the U.S. armed forces who violates Philippine laws, the commander of USS Guardian, , Lt. Cmdr. Mark Rice, was not charged in Philippine Court nor any one of his 79-man crew.

USS Guardian in Tubbataha

USS Guardian in Tubbataha

Rice and his crew were re-assigned to USS Warrior. A news report quoted Rice saying,” All 79 Guardian Sailors made it home …” He praised his men for the “courage and dedication” they showed when USS Guardian ran aground.

Rice blamed faulty map for straying into the prohibited area.

For a fleeting moment , on Jan. 26, a week after the incident, Aquino talked about enforcing Philippine laws on the Americans. In an interview on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Aquino said, “Our laws are very specific. When they got the diplomatic clearance to pass through our waters, this is a recognized, internationally recognized zone, that is, like an exclusive zone. They violated it. There are penalties.”

Republic Act 10067 establishing the Tubbataha Reefs natural park in Palawan as a protected area prohibits the entry to Tubbataha Reef without the permission of the Tubbataha Protected Area Management Board.

The law says violators will be penalized with a jail term of up to one year and a fine ranging from P100,000 to P300,000.

It’s the same law that Aquino wants to be strictly applied to the 12 Chinese fishermen, whose boat, Ming Long Yu, got stuck in Tubbataha almost midnight of April 8.

Maybe it’s a coincidence but last Monday marked one year that Chinese fishing boats were apprehended in Bajo de Masinloc also known as Scarborough Shoal (the Chinese refer to it as Huangyan island) which triggered a two-month standoff and finally led to the filing by the Philippines of a petition against China with the United Nations Arbitral Court.

News reports said Aquino was upset by the report of Chinese intrusion in Tubbataha Reef. He was in Roxas City for the groundbreaking of the Capiz airport. “”Ang bottom line d’yan, merong tayong batas, Republic Act 10067, that states everything that needs to be known. ‘Pag pumasok ka within this zone, may presumption na agad na poaching ‘yung pakay mo. May kaukulang penalties, may imprisonment, may fine. Our job as the Executive department is to execute the law,” he said.

As ordered by the President, charges of poaching and other violations were immediately filed against the Chinese fishermen.

Adelle Villena of the Palawan Council for Sustainable Development said the fishermen will also be charged with bribery for allegedly offering the Rangers guarding the protected site with $2,400 when their boat ran aground.

The Chinese fishermen are really in trouble because Philippine Navy sources said materials they confiscated from the boat make them believe that the 12 were not really fishermen. “If you look at those guys, they do not have the sturdy physique and complexion of fishermen, “Navy sources said.

See, Philippine officials know their law and how to execute it if they want to. They also know which group of people to apply the law and which group are exempted from the law.

WWF-Philippines’ New Mobile Game to Raise Funds for a Cause


Words by Ethel Merioles

Remember the Tubbataha Reef incident that happened last month? Just a little background on the World Heritage site located in the Sulu Sea, over 1000 animal species inhabit in the reef, including hawksbill sea turtles, giant trevally (jacks), hammerhead sharks, barracudas, manta rays, palm-sized Moorish idols, napoleon wrasse, parrotfish, and moray eels. Whale sharks and tiger sharks have reportedly been seen in the large coral sanctuary, as well.








The Tubbataha Reef is just one of six marine priority conservation areas that WWF-Philippines are helping, and this time, in an effort to raise funds for a cause, the independent conservation organization released a cool mobile game in February this year.

As part of WWF-Philippines’ fund raising campaign to save marine animals from pollutants and unsustainable fishing practices, a Filipino app development company known as AppLabs Digital Studios designed and developed a time-pressure puzzle game. The game is primarily meant to provide hours of entertainment to any user and at the same time donate to WWF-Philippines’ marine conservation programs. A dollar can go a long way, especially if it means saving the rich marine biodiversity of the Philippines, including, of course, the world-renowned Tubbataha Reef.



The app, dubbed EnviroPop, is currently available for download at the Apple App Store, and will reach the Android market very soon. Sales from the app will go straight to WWF-Philippines’marine conservation programs to help conserve our biodiversity and mitigate the impact of human footprint on our environment. With this app, people will learn more about our environment and essentially save the Philippine seas!
Interested iOS users may try the app for free (Download link: http://goo.gl/kwUKU) or purchase the full version for $0.99 (http://goo.gl/Qec9I). The Android version is scheduled to be released early this year.

VFA does not say PH can be dumping site of US wastes

MT Glenn Guardian and MT Glenn Enterprise, vessels of Glenn Defense Marine Asia in Subic Bay. Thanks to Subic Bay News for this photo.

The lawyers of Glenn Defense Marine Asia better look for a justification much more astounding than the Visiting Forces Agreement for the dumping of toxic waste in Philippine waters by their client, Malaysian firm Glenn Defense Marine Asia.

Senators Miriam Defensor-Santiago, chair of the Committee on Constitutional Amendments and acknowledged expert on international law, and Loren Legarda, chair of the Committee on Foreign Relations and co-chair of the Legislative Oversight Committee on the VFA, are calling for an investigation of the dumping in Subic Bay of Glenn Defense of toxic wastes from a US navy ship, Emory Land last month.

It has been reported that Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority Chair Roberto Garcia is investigating the incident and is asking Glenn Defense side on the illegal act.

Inquirer reported that Glenn Defense lawyers Kristoffer James Purisima and Bernard Joseph Malibiran of Villaraza Cruz Marcelo law firm invoked the VFA, not SBMA, as the body that has jurisdiction over their client. They did not deny the accusation of their client’s dumping of toxic wastes in Philippine waters.

“At the outset, it should be pointed out that our client provides marine husbandry and logistics support services (support vessels) solely and exclusively to US Navy vessels visiting the Philippines pursuant to the provisions of the VFA between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States,” the lawyers said.

They further said:” It is clear that vessels operating by or for the United States armed forces – such as the support vessels of our client – may enter the Philippines upon the approval of the government if the Philippines and the movement thereof shall be the subject to mutually acceptable implementing agreements.”

Purisima and Malibiran must have been scraping the bottom of the barrel to have forwarded that defense of their clients’ condemnable act.

The VFA, signed on Feb. 10, 1998 by Foreign Secretary Domingo Siazon and U.S. Ambassador Thomas Hubbard, took effect upon the ratification by the Senate on May 27, 1998.

A primer on the VFA by the U.S. Embassy states: “The VFA is essentially about the treatment of U.S. armed forces and defense personnel who would be visiting the Philippines take part in activities covered by the 1951 Mutual defense Treaty and approved by the Philippine Government.”

“The Agreement gives substance to the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty by serving as legal framework in promoting defense cooperation between the Philippines and the United States.”

The VFA was needed because after the Senate rejected an extension of the 1947 Military Bases Agreement in 1991, there was no legal coverage of U.S. personnel who would be coming to the Philippines for joint military exercises or other missions. Until the VFA took effect in May 1999, “Balikatan”, the joint PH-US military exercises were suspended.

The most sensitive issue was criminal jurisdiction. Like, who would have jurisdiction when military personnel violates Philippine laws while in the Philippines during an official mission?

Article II of the VFA is titled “Respect for Law.”

It says: “It is the duty of the United States personnel to respect the laws of the Republic of the Philippines and to abstain from any activity inconsistent with the spirit of this agreement, and, in particular, from any political activity in the Philippines. The Government of the United States shall take all measures within its authority to ensure that this is done.”

R.A. No. 6969, or the Toxic Substances and Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes Control Act, prohibits “the storage, importation, or bringing into Philippines territory, including its maritime economic zones, even in transit, either by means of land, air or sea transportation or otherwise keeping in storage any amount of hazardous and nuclear wastes in any part of the Philippines.

Santiago said Glenn Defense’s dumping of toxic wastes in Philippines waters is in violation of not just Philippine laws but also international agreements.

Santiago said Glenn Defense’s dumping of toxic wastes in Philippines waters is in violation of not just Philippine laws but also international agreements. She cited the Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 1978 (MARPOL).

“As a treaty, MARPOL is of universal application and enforcement. It must be stressed that the customary norms it embodies are generally accepted principles of international law, which our Constitution proclaims as part of the law of the land,” she said.
***
Statement of Greenpeace Oceans Campaigner Vince Cinches:

“This deliberate dumping of toxic substances is an additional assault to the already sorry situation of our marine ecosystem and may further affect the lives of people dependent on our seas.”

“It is also a complete disregard of existing international marine conservation treaties to which the Philippines is a signatory, specifically the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter 1972, also known as the London Convention.”

“Unfortunately, this is another example of how the lax implementation of environmental laws is destroying our natural resources. A thorough investigation is necessary to find out who is accountable for this environmental crime.”