Zotac GTX 950 Review

Gaming on a budget might seem impossible – but it’s not. While some might enjoy cranking all the settings to their highest at the highest possible resolution, some people are content with decent 1080p gaming performance for casual competitive games.

There are numerous cards out there that can accommodate this field, but here we have the Zotac GTX 950. The entry-level gaming card by Zotac that uses Nvidia’s Maxwell architecture.

GPU Zotac GTX 950 Zotac GTX 950 Amp! Edition GTX 950 Reference
CUDA Cores:  768 768 768
Base Clock 1102 MHz 1203 MHz 1024 Mhz
Boost Clock 1279 MHz 1405 MHz 1188 Mhz
Memory Clock: 6804 MHz  7020 MHz 6.6 Gbps
Memory Size:  2GB GDDR5  2GB GDDR5 2GB GDDR5
Memory Interface Width:  128-bit 128-bit 128-bit
Memory Bandwith (GB/sec): 105.6 105.6 105.6
Simulataneous Multi-Projection: No No No
 VR Ready: No No No
 Nvidia Ansel: No No No
 NVIDIA SLI Ready: Yes – 2 Way Yes – 2 Way Yes – 2 Way
 NVIDIA G-SYNC Ready: Yes
Yes Yes
 NVIDIA GameStream Ready: Yes Yes Yes
 NVIDIA GPU Boost: 2.0 2.0 2.0
 Microsoft Direct X: 12 12 12
 Vulkan API: Yes Yes Yes
 OpenGL: 4.5 4.5 4.5
 Bus Support: PCIe 3 PCIe 3 PCIe 3
 Height: 4.37598″ 4.37598″ 4.376″
 Length: 6.85039″ 8.18898″ 7.938″
 Width: Dual Dual Dual
 Graphics Card Power: 90W 90W 90W
 Recommended Power Supply: 300W 300W 350W

Zotac currently has 2 different versions of the GTX 950, the standard 950 that we have right here and the Amp! Edition 950 which has a faster clock speed than the aftermarket 950 and reference 950.

We compared the Zotac GTX 950, Zotac GTX 950 Amp! Edition, and the reference GTX 950 side by side to see what are the differences between the three.

While it is expected that the Amp! Edition has advantages over the two, the after-market 950 of Zotac is slightly smaller and faster than the reference GTX 950 for almost 100Mhz both on base and boost clock. This will lead to a slight increase in FPS.

Aside from the slightly smaller size and performance increase, the Zotac GTX 950 requires only a 300W power supply than the reference GTX 950. While this is somewhat not important due to both cards drawing the same 90W power, it could be useful (and comforting) for older rigs out there that have a 300W power supply.

Unboxing

Box 2

The packaging of the GTX 950 is satisfactory. The box is presented in a clean and simple but noteworthy looking design – a big difference compared to most graphics card boxes. It’s not fancy but at the same time it doesn’t feel and look cheap.

Box 4

Upon opening the box, you’ll pull out another box which would be encasing the card and its contents.

Packaging 4

Inside the box is the manual, some advertisement papers, the CD, and finally the GPU itself protected by a safe bubble wrap.

Extra

The card also comes equipped with a Molex to 6-pin power connector for those older PSUs that doesn’t have a supplementary 6-pin PCIe power cable.

Packaging 1

Packaging 2

Unlike most graphics card aftermarket sellers, Zotac kept it simple – which is always a good thing in our book.

Design and Construction

The card itself has a very premium feel despite not having a backplate. But, considering it’s a 950, it is to be expected. It feels very light while at the same time heavy enough for you to expect it as a premium card. It is a dual-slot card that has a height of 4.37598 inches and a length of 6.85039 inches.

Card Full 1

The card is cooled by two copper heat pipes driven by Zotac’s FreezeTech fan technology.

Card Front 2

Card Back 1

For connectivity, the card boasts DVI-I and DVI-D connectors, Display Port, and HDMI.

Side 2

On the side of the card is the printed “Zotac” logo while sporting the 6-pin PCIe external power connection to power up the card.

Card Side 2

Once again, unlike higher-tier cards the GTX 950 doesn’t sport a backplate.

PCIe Power

Cooling the card is Zotac’s FreezeTech technology which means the fan doesn’t operate on average/low temperatures or if the card isn’t on load.

Card Backplate

All in all, the Zotac GTX 950 looks and feels premium thanks to its aluminum body accompanied by Zotac’s custom technology.

Benchmarks

We’ll be benchmarking the GTX 950 in a Core i7-4790K processor, accompanied by 16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum running at 1866Mhz, with a 250GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD.

Clearly from the specifications, there are no bottlenecking issues with our rig and the card, which means you’ll be seeing the GTX 950’s performance at its fullest. We’ll be providing more details of the individual benchmarks below.

CPU Specs:

GPU Intel Core i7-4790k
GPU Zotac GTX 1080 Amp! Extreme
RAM 16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum
MOBO: Maximus VI Extreme
HDD: 2TB Seagate 7200rpm
SSD: Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
PSU: Corsair AX1200i

Take note that the i7-4790K is not overclocked. We’ll be benchmarking the games below in stock speeds with no overclocking whatsoever.

Assassins Creed Syndicate

ACS-media-SS-4-big_202195

The Assassins Creed series has been known as a PC power hog even in its early days. Though with the release of Assassins Creed Unity, they have become more notorious thanks to the game’s huge location accompanied by it’s lush and beautifully detailed environment.

Assassins Creed Syndicate

The game is playable even at very high settings in 1080p with an average framerate of 37FPS. In 1440p, however, the game slows down averaging only 22FPS. While in some scenarios, the game would drop to even 15 or so. In 4K, whilst expected, it was unplayable.

Witcher 3

witcher3_en_wallpaper_the_witcher_3_wild_hunt_geralt_with_trophies_1920x1080_1449484678

If AMD’s attempt in making pure hair was Tomb Raider, Nvidia did the same with The Witcher 3. The series has always been known as a dominant series in the RPG scene, and The Witcher 3 did pretty much the same though with better graphics, better gameplay, overall longer story and better delivery of characters.

The Witcher 3

With a preset of Ultra + AA enabled with hairworks off, and SSAO on, the game ran at an average of 32 FPS. In 1440p, the game was somewhat unplayable with an average of 22 FPS while in some scenarios the game’s FPS would drop even below 10 but eventually bounce back to 15-20FPS. At 4K the game is rendered completely unplayable.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

ROTTR_Review_Screenshot__4_.0

Ever since the release of Tomb Raider (2013) we already knew for a fact that the series’ upcoming games are meant to be benchmarked. Lara’s “pure hair” texture thanks to AMD’s TressFX technology back then really changed things for graphics and showed the incredible potential of the PC port. The same goes for the Rise of the Tomb Raider.

Rise of the Tomb Raider does not only features Lara, but also has incredibly detailed environments, better rendering performance, amazing tessellation, and the “pure hair”.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

Performance on Rise of the Tomb Raider is different from all of the benchmarks that we have here. With the game cranked to high settings with “pure hair” on and HBAO+ and FXAA, the game is demanding. At 1080p the game reaches an average of 34FPS, while that is completely playable, some might disagree and there were frequent occasions where the FPS would drop around 25 or even below.

In 1440p the game started to become unplayable and at 4K the game was completely useless due to its 10fps average whilst sometimes going below up to 4FPS on some occasions.

Shadow of Mordor

shadow-of-mordor-1940x1091

A personal favorite of us, Shadow of Mordor is a dream come true for any LotR fan. The game looks stunning, at the same time, the combat system of the game also felt amazing and great. The story is great as well and it is taxing even for higher end GPUs especially if you’re running the game at 4K with the highest settings.

Shadow of Mordor

In our benchmarks, the game ran well at 1080p running at Ultra Quality while delivering a still somewhat playable experience at 1440p. Bringing down the settings of the game will no doubt increase performance. As expected, in 4K gaming, the card wasn’t able to push things up and was complete unplayable even dropping at around 6fps in some areas and situations of the game.

Grand Theft Auto V

12_gtavpc_03272015

Grand Theft Auto literally revolutionized on how RPG games are presented ever since the foundation of GTA III back then. The game was the first “true open world 3D game” back then that features a unique story, great gameplay, and is still actually fun today.

More than a decade has passed though since GTA III, and numerous advances have happened throughout its release. Here we have GTA V. This is one of our favorite games thanks to the three characters with their unique story line and personality and overall amazing atmosphere especially if the graphics are cranked up to their highest.

GTA V

GTA V is an amazing looking game that’s very taxing even for high-end setups especially if the advance graphics are on and MSAA/FXAA is run at max with Nvidia PCSS enabled. In our benchmarks, the game is playable having a 51fps average on 1080p while averaging an above 30fps performance at 1440p. In 4K, the game was starting to become unplayable especially during gunfights.

Conclusion

Clearly, from the benchmarks, the card itself can run very well in mixed settings depending on the game at 1080p. In 1440p, the card has some potential as long as you turn down the settings by a bit. 4K gaming, however, is not recommended though it is expected since this is an entry level card for just Php8,050.

All in all, the Zotac GTX 950 is a good entry level card that is perfect for average gaming needs. It might not be capable enough to max out games at 1080p with at least an average of 60fps, but it is still capable of playing several games in playable framerates at 1080p.

The post Zotac GTX 950 Review appeared first on YugaTech | Philippines Tech News & Reviews.

Zotac GTX 950 Review

Gaming on a budget might seem impossible – but it’s not. While some might enjoy cranking all the settings to their highest at the highest possible resolution, some people are content with decent 1080p gaming performance for casual competitive games.

There are numerous cards out there that can accommodate this field, but here we have the Zotac GTX 950. The entry-level gaming card by Zotac that uses Nvidia’s Maxwell architecture.

GPU Zotac GTX 950 Zotac GTX 950 Amp! Edition GTX 950 Reference
CUDA Cores:  768 768 768
Base Clock 1102 MHz 1203 MHz 1024 Mhz
Boost Clock 1279 MHz 1405 MHz 1188 Mhz
Memory Clock: 6804 MHz  7020 MHz 6.6 Gbps
Memory Size:  2GB GDDR5  2GB GDDR5 2GB GDDR5
Memory Interface Width:  128-bit 128-bit 128-bit
Memory Bandwith (GB/sec): 105.6 105.6 105.6
Simulataneous Multi-Projection: No No No
 VR Ready: No No No
 Nvidia Ansel: No No No
 NVIDIA SLI Ready: Yes – 2 Way Yes – 2 Way Yes – 2 Way
 NVIDIA G-SYNC Ready: Yes
Yes Yes
 NVIDIA GameStream Ready: Yes Yes Yes
 NVIDIA GPU Boost: 2.0 2.0 2.0
 Microsoft Direct X: 12 12 12
 Vulkan API: Yes Yes Yes
 OpenGL: 4.5 4.5 4.5
 Bus Support: PCIe 3 PCIe 3 PCIe 3
 Height: 4.37598″ 4.37598″ 4.376″
 Length: 6.85039″ 8.18898″ 7.938″
 Width: Dual Dual Dual
 Graphics Card Power: 90W 90W 90W
 Recommended Power Supply: 300W 300W 350W

Zotac currently has 2 different versions of the GTX 950, the standard 950 that we have right here and the Amp! Edition 950 which has a faster clock speed than the aftermarket 950 and reference 950.

We compared the Zotac GTX 950, Zotac GTX 950 Amp! Edition, and the reference GTX 950 side by side to see what are the differences between the three.

While it is expected that the Amp! Edition has advantages over the two, the after-market 950 of Zotac is slightly smaller and faster than the reference GTX 950 for almost 100Mhz both on base and boost clock. This will lead to a slight increase in FPS.

Aside from the slightly smaller size and performance increase, the Zotac GTX 950 requires only a 300W power supply than the reference GTX 950. While this is somewhat not important due to both cards drawing the same 90W power, it could be useful (and comforting) for older rigs out there that have a 300W power supply.

Unboxing

Box 2

The packaging of the GTX 950 is satisfactory. The box is presented in a clean and simple but noteworthy looking design – a big difference compared to most graphics card boxes. It’s not fancy but at the same time it doesn’t feel and look cheap.

Box 4

Upon opening the box, you’ll pull out another box which would be encasing the card and its contents.

Packaging 4

Inside the box is the manual, some advertisement papers, the CD, and finally the GPU itself protected by a safe bubble wrap.

Extra

The card also comes equipped with a Molex to 6-pin power connector for those older PSUs that doesn’t have a supplementary 6-pin PCIe power cable.

Packaging 1

Packaging 2

Unlike most graphics card aftermarket sellers, Zotac kept it simple – which is always a good thing in our book.

Design and Construction

The card itself has a very premium feel despite not having a backplate. But, considering it’s a 950, it is to be expected. It feels very light while at the same time heavy enough for you to expect it as a premium card. It is a dual-slot card that has a height of 4.37598 inches and a length of 6.85039 inches.

Card Full 1

The card is cooled by two copper heat pipes driven by Zotac’s FreezeTech fan technology.

Card Front 2

Card Back 1

For connectivity, the card boasts DVI-I and DVI-D connectors, Display Port, and HDMI.

Side 2

On the side of the card is the printed “Zotac” logo while sporting the 6-pin PCIe external power connection to power up the card.

Card Side 2

Once again, unlike higher-tier cards the GTX 950 doesn’t sport a backplate.

PCIe Power

Cooling the card is Zotac’s FreezeTech technology which means the fan doesn’t operate on average/low temperatures or if the card isn’t on load.

Card Backplate

All in all, the Zotac GTX 950 looks and feels premium thanks to its aluminum body accompanied by Zotac’s custom technology.

Benchmarks

We’ll be benchmarking the GTX 950 in a Core i7-4790K processor, accompanied by 16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum running at 1866Mhz, with a 250GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD.

Clearly from the specifications, there are no bottlenecking issues with our rig and the card, which means you’ll be seeing the GTX 950’s performance at its fullest. We’ll be providing more details of the individual benchmarks below.

CPU Specs:

GPU Intel Core i7-4790k
GPU Zotac GTX 1080 Amp! Extreme
RAM 16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum
MOBO: Maximus VI Extreme
HDD: 2TB Seagate 7200rpm
SSD: Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
PSU: Corsair AX1200i

Take note that the i7-4790K is not overclocked. We’ll be benchmarking the games below in stock speeds with no overclocking whatsoever.

Assassins Creed Syndicate

ACS-media-SS-4-big_202195

The Assassins Creed series has been known as a PC power hog even in its early days. Though with the release of Assassins Creed Unity, they have become more notorious thanks to the game’s huge location accompanied by it’s lush and beautifully detailed environment.

Assassins Creed Syndicate

The game is playable even at very high settings in 1080p with an average framerate of 37FPS. In 1440p, however, the game slows down averaging only 22FPS. While in some scenarios, the game would drop to even 15 or so. In 4K, whilst expected, it was unplayable.

Witcher 3

witcher3_en_wallpaper_the_witcher_3_wild_hunt_geralt_with_trophies_1920x1080_1449484678

If AMD’s attempt in making pure hair was Tomb Raider, Nvidia did the same with The Witcher 3. The series has always been known as a dominant series in the RPG scene, and The Witcher 3 did pretty much the same though with better graphics, better gameplay, overall longer story and better delivery of characters.

The Witcher 3

With a preset of Ultra + AA enabled with hairworks off, and SSAO on, the game ran at an average of 32 FPS. In 1440p, the game was somewhat unplayable with an average of 22 FPS while in some scenarios the game’s FPS would drop even below 10 but eventually bounce back to 15-20FPS. At 4K the game is rendered completely unplayable.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

ROTTR_Review_Screenshot__4_.0

Ever since the release of Tomb Raider (2013) we already knew for a fact that the series’ upcoming games are meant to be benchmarked. Lara’s “pure hair” texture thanks to AMD’s TressFX technology back then really changed things for graphics and showed the incredible potential of the PC port. The same goes for the Rise of the Tomb Raider.

Rise of the Tomb Raider does not only features Lara, but also has incredibly detailed environments, better rendering performance, amazing tessellation, and the “pure hair”.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

Performance on Rise of the Tomb Raider is different from all of the benchmarks that we have here. With the game cranked to high settings with “pure hair” on and HBAO+ and FXAA, the game is demanding. At 1080p the game reaches an average of 34FPS, while that is completely playable, some might disagree and there were frequent occasions where the FPS would drop around 25 or even below.

In 1440p the game started to become unplayable and at 4K the game was completely useless due to its 10fps average whilst sometimes going below up to 4FPS on some occasions.

Shadow of Mordor

shadow-of-mordor-1940x1091

A personal favorite of us, Shadow of Mordor is a dream come true for any LotR fan. The game looks stunning, at the same time, the combat system of the game also felt amazing and great. The story is great as well and it is taxing even for higher end GPUs especially if you’re running the game at 4K with the highest settings.

Shadow of Mordor

In our benchmarks, the game ran well at 1080p running at Ultra Quality while delivering a still somewhat playable experience at 1440p. Bringing down the settings of the game will no doubt increase performance. As expected, in 4K gaming, the card wasn’t able to push things up and was complete unplayable even dropping at around 6fps in some areas and situations of the game.

Grand Theft Auto V

12_gtavpc_03272015

Grand Theft Auto literally revolutionized on how RPG games are presented ever since the foundation of GTA III back then. The game was the first “true open world 3D game” back then that features a unique story, great gameplay, and is still actually fun today.

More than a decade has passed though since GTA III, and numerous advances have happened throughout its release. Here we have GTA V. This is one of our favorite games thanks to the three characters with their unique story line and personality and overall amazing atmosphere especially if the graphics are cranked up to their highest.

GTA V

GTA V is an amazing looking game that’s very taxing even for high-end setups especially if the advance graphics are on and MSAA/FXAA is run at max with Nvidia PCSS enabled. In our benchmarks, the game is playable having a 51fps average on 1080p while averaging an above 30fps performance at 1440p. In 4K, the game was starting to become unplayable especially during gunfights.

Conclusion

Clearly, from the benchmarks, the card itself can run very well in mixed settings depending on the game at 1080p. In 1440p, the card has some potential as long as you turn down the settings by a bit. 4K gaming, however, is not recommended though it is expected since this is an entry level card for just Php8,050.

All in all, the Zotac GTX 950 is a good entry level card that is perfect for average gaming needs. It might not be capable enough to max out games at 1080p with at least an average of 60fps, but it is still capable of playing several games in playable framerates at 1080p.

The post Zotac GTX 950 Review appeared first on YugaTech | Philippines Tech News & Reviews.

Php30,000 AMD Gaming Build Guide – 2016

30K AMD BUILD 1

AMD has always been known as a cheaper alternative when buying PC components compared to Intel and Nvidia. Their latest RX-480 graphics card costs only $200 (ironically Php14,000 here) and is a beast at 1080p gaming that’s also VR Ready. An extremely well known company, we are eager to see what graphics card would AMD throw against the 1080 since the RX-480 is only a match for the GTX 1060 and doesn’t even go near a GTX 1070 in terms of performance.

You can never go wrong with the RX-480 considering its price tag. It is a definite must have for those who are on a budget and wants to have a smooth 1080p gaming experience that is also VR Ready. Many people have been asking for a build guide within Php30k that utilizes AMD’s latest GPU. This is where this build comes in. In the near future we will be updating our guides once the RX-470 and RX-460 are released.

Below is our Php30,000 AMD PC Gaming Build Guide 2016. We have provided two different builds and I’ll be explaining the performance of each build and a recap on what build is for you. As I’ve mentioned we will be utilizing the RX-480 in one of our builds here.

Build 1:

Part Name Price
CPU: AMD Vishera FX-8350 4.0GHz 8,650
GPU: Sapphire NITRO R9-380 Dual-X OC 2GB GDDR5 9,890
MOBO: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P 4,150
RAM: Gskill RipjawsX 8GB (4×2) 2133 CL9 2,620
HDD: Seagate 1TB 7200RPM ST1000DM003 2,450
SSD: N/A N/A
PSU: Corsair VS550 2,190
CASE: Tecware Infinity 1,240

PRICE: PHP31,190

The FX-8350 is still an extremely affordable and efficient processor. Despite being 2 years old, the processor still packs a punch because of its 8-core structure accompanied with a very fast clock speed of 4.0Ghz. This means you wont have to worry about mere bottlenecks especially if you’ll be playing small or casual competitive games such as Dota 2 and CS:GO.

For the graphics card we used the Sapphire NITRO R9-380 Dual X OC Edition. The R9-380 itself is already a grand card capable of playing AAA games in high settings at 1080p with decent framerates. Its not as powerful as Nvidia’s newer Pascal graphics card line or the RX-480, but considering our budget and since its Php4,000 cheaper, it’s still a good option.

If you have a slightly bigger budget, go for the 4GB version of the r9-380. The extra 2GB of RAM will do great when playing games with large texture files. Below are videos of the R9-380’s performance.

GTA V

Dark Souls 3

Tom Clancy’s The Division

Battlefield 4

Rise of the Tomb Raider

 

Build 2:

Part Name Price
CPU: AMD Vishera FX-8320E 3.50GHz 8-Core 6,390
GPU: Sapphire RX 480 8GB GDDR5 13,800
MOBO: ASRock N68C-GS4 FX 2,350
RAM: Corsair 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz 1,850
HDD: Seagate 1TB 7200RPM ST1000DM003 2,450
SSD: N/A N/A
PSU: Corsair VS550 2,190
CASE: Tecware Infinity 1,240

PRICE: PHP30,270

The energy efficient baby brother of the FX-8350, the FX-8320E is an efficient 8-core processor running at 3.50Ghz. It is a tad slower than the FX-8350, but it is also cheaper and more power efficient. We partnered it with Sapphire’s RX 480 graphics card. Unlike the other build, we have a slower RAM due to a much cheaper motherboard to make way for the RX-480, but is sufficient enough for gaming. You won’t notice much of difference in RAM speed either way.

The FX-8320E will most likely bottleneck the card if the game is CPU extensive. Other than that, you can expect this build to run selected AAA games at High/Ultra Settings in 1080p and mixed settings at 1440p with good framerates. Below are videos of the RX-480’s performance.

The Witcher 3

Batman: Arkham Knight

Tom Clancy’s Rainbox Six Seige

Need for Speed 2015

Just Cause 3

Bottomline:

With Php30,000 you could buy yourself a decent rig that’s capable of playing any game today with decent framerates. While of course you should expect performance to degrade as years pass by due to technological advancements, with this guide we assure you that you will give you a decent gaming experience as of now.

Between the two builds I would prefer the first one due to its better motherboard, faster ram, and the R9-380 is actually sufficient enough for gaming. If you have a higher budget, even if its just Php5,000 more, choose the first build then buy yourself an RX-480. The advantage of the secondbuild compared to the first one is gaming performance out of the box thanks to the RX-480.

If you’re not sure which build to choose, here we state the differences and the advantages of each build.

  • Build 1 – FX-8350 and an R9-380
    • Best build between the two for long term upgrade. The build has better parts in almost every aspect compared to the second one.
    • Faster CPU but weaker GPU. The FX-8350 is stronger than the 8320e, but since the R9-380 is weaker than the RX-480, gaming performance will have a massive difference.
    • Choose this build if you plan on upgrading in the future. Just buy a new graphics card, or if you have a bit more money to spend, just buy an RX-480 instantly and you’ll get a significantly better performance than the second one.
  • Build 2 – FX-8320E and an RX-480

    • Only suitable for those who have little to no plans on upgrading, the FX-8320E whilst good, will bottleneck higher end cards much more than the FX-8350.
    • Gaming performance is significantly better than build 1, though with the cost of parts. This build has a cheaper motherboard, slower ram, and slower processor to make room for the RX-480.
    • Choose this build if you have little to no plans on upgrading. This is intended for those who wants to game out of the box at high settings in 1080p and even capable of 1440p thanks to the RX-480.

All in all with Php30,000 you could buy yourself a good rig that is VR Ready (R9-380 not VR ready though is capable in playing some VR Games based on experience). If you’re planning for a long term upgrade, go with the first build. But if you intend to max out everything at 1080p and have little plans on buying parts in the future, go with the second one. All in all, he hope this guide gives you an insight as to what your Php30,000 can do.

Are you looking for a cheaper rig? or a new laptop? Check out our:

We will be posting an Intel build sometime in the future.

The post Php30,000 AMD Gaming Build Guide – 2016 appeared first on YugaTech | Philippines News & Tech Reviews.

Php30,000 AMD Gaming Build Guide – 2016

30K AMD BUILD 1

AMD has always been known as a cheaper alternative when buying PC components compared to Intel and Nvidia. Their latest RX-480 graphics card costs only $200 (ironically Php14,000 here) and is a beast at 1080p gaming that’s also VR Ready. An extremely well known company, we are eager to see what graphics card would AMD throw against the 1080 since the RX-480 is only a match for the GTX 1060 and doesn’t even go near a GTX 1070 in terms of performance.

You can never go wrong with the RX-480 considering its price tag. It is a definite must have for those who are on a budget and wants to have a smooth 1080p gaming experience that is also VR Ready. Many people have been asking for a build guide within Php30k that utilizes AMD’s latest GPU. This is where this build comes in. In the near future we will be updating our guides once the RX-470 and RX-460 are released.

Below is our Php30,000 AMD PC Gaming Build Guide 2016. We have provided two different builds and I’ll be explaining the performance of each build and a recap on what build is for you. As I’ve mentioned we will be utilizing the RX-480 in one of our builds here.

Build 1:

Part Name Price
CPU: AMD Vishera FX-8350 4.0GHz 8,650
GPU: Sapphire NITRO R9-380 Dual-X OC 2GB GDDR5 9,890
MOBO: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P 4,150
RAM: Gskill RipjawsX 8GB (4×2) 2133 CL9 2,620
HDD: Seagate 1TB 7200RPM ST1000DM003 2,450
SSD: N/A N/A
PSU: Corsair VS550 2,190
CASE: Tecware Infinity 1,240

PRICE: PHP31,190

The FX-8350 is still an extremely affordable and efficient processor. Despite being 2 years old, the processor still packs a punch because of its 8-core structure accompanied with a very fast clock speed of 4.0Ghz. This means you wont have to worry about mere bottlenecks especially if you’ll be playing small or casual competitive games such as Dota 2 and CS:GO.

For the graphics card we used the Sapphire NITRO R9-380 Dual X OC Edition. The R9-380 itself is already a grand card capable of playing AAA games in high settings at 1080p with decent framerates. Its not as powerful as Nvidia’s newer Pascal graphics card line or the RX-480, but considering our budget and since its Php4,000 cheaper, it’s still a good option.

If you have a slightly bigger budget, go for the 4GB version of the r9-380. The extra 2GB of RAM will do great when playing games with large texture files. Below are videos of the R9-380’s performance.

GTA V

Dark Souls 3

Tom Clancy’s The Division

Battlefield 4

Rise of the Tomb Raider

 

Build 2:

Part Name Price
CPU: AMD Vishera FX-8320E 3.50GHz 8-Core 6,390
GPU: Sapphire RX 480 8GB GDDR5 13,800
MOBO: ASRock N68C-GS4 FX 2,350
RAM: Corsair 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz 1,850
HDD: Seagate 1TB 7200RPM ST1000DM003 2,450
SSD: N/A N/A
PSU: Corsair VS550 2,190
CASE: Tecware Infinity 1,240

PRICE: PHP30,270

The energy efficient baby brother of the FX-8350, the FX-8320E is an efficient 8-core processor running at 3.50Ghz. It is a tad slower than the FX-8350, but it is also cheaper and more power efficient. We partnered it with Sapphire’s RX 480 graphics card. Unlike the other build, we have a slower RAM due to a much cheaper motherboard to make way for the RX-480, but is sufficient enough for gaming. You won’t notice much of difference in RAM speed either way.

The FX-8320E will most likely bottleneck the card if the game is CPU extensive. Other than that, you can expect this build to run selected AAA games at High/Ultra Settings in 1080p and mixed settings at 1440p with good framerates. Below are videos of the RX-480’s performance.

The Witcher 3

Batman: Arkham Knight

Tom Clancy’s Rainbox Six Seige

Need for Speed 2015

Just Cause 3

Bottomline:

With Php30,000 you could buy yourself a decent rig that’s capable of playing any game today with decent framerates. While of course you should expect performance to degrade as years pass by due to technological advancements, with this guide we assure you that you will give you a decent gaming experience as of now.

Between the two builds I would prefer the first one due to its better motherboard, faster ram, and the R9-380 is actually sufficient enough for gaming. If you have a higher budget, even if its just Php5,000 more, choose the first build then buy yourself an RX-480. The advantage of the secondbuild compared to the first one is gaming performance out of the box thanks to the RX-480.

If you’re not sure which build to choose, here we state the differences and the advantages of each build.

  • Build 1 – FX-8350 and an R9-380
    • Best build between the two for long term upgrade. The build has better parts in almost every aspect compared to the second one.
    • Faster CPU but weaker GPU. The FX-8350 is stronger than the 8320e, but since the R9-380 is weaker than the RX-480, gaming performance will have a massive difference.
    • Choose this build if you plan on upgrading in the future. Just buy a new graphics card, or if you have a bit more money to spend, just buy an RX-480 instantly and you’ll get a significantly better performance than the second one.
  • Build 2 – FX-8320E and an RX-480

    • Only suitable for those who have little to no plans on upgrading, the FX-8320E whilst good, will bottleneck higher end cards much more than the FX-8350.
    • Gaming performance is significantly better than build 1, though with the cost of parts. This build has a cheaper motherboard, slower ram, and slower processor to make room for the RX-480.
    • Choose this build if you have little to no plans on upgrading. This is intended for those who wants to game out of the box at high settings in 1080p and even capable of 1440p thanks to the RX-480.

All in all with Php30,000 you could buy yourself a good rig that is VR Ready (R9-380 not VR ready though is capable in playing some VR Games based on experience). If you’re planning for a long term upgrade, go with the first build. But if you intend to max out everything at 1080p and have little plans on buying parts in the future, go with the second one. All in all, he hope this guide gives you an insight as to what your Php30,000 can do.

Are you looking for a cheaper rig? or a new laptop? Check out our:

We will be posting an Intel build sometime in the future.

The post Php30,000 AMD Gaming Build Guide – 2016 appeared first on YugaTech | Philippines News & Tech Reviews.

Php30,000 AMD Gaming Build Guide – 2016

30K AMD BUILD 1

AMD has always been known as a cheaper alternative when buying PC components compared to Intel and Nvidia. Their latest RX-480 graphics card costs only $200 (ironically Php14,000 here) and is a beast at 1080p gaming that’s also VR Ready. An extremely well known company, we are eager to see what graphics card would AMD throw against the 1080 since the RX-480 is only a match for the GTX 1060 and doesn’t even go near a GTX 1070 in terms of performance.

You can never go wrong with the RX-480 considering its price tag. It is a definite must have for those who are on a budget and wants to have a smooth 1080p gaming experience that is also VR Ready. Many people have been asking for a build guide within Php30k that utilizes AMD’s latest GPU. This is where this build comes in. In the near future we will be updating our guides once the RX-470 and RX-460 are released.

Below is our Php30,000 AMD PC Gaming Build Guide 2016. We have provided two different builds and I’ll be explaining the performance of each build and a recap on what build is for you. As I’ve mentioned we will be utilizing the RX-480 in one of our builds here.

Build 1:

Part Name Price
CPU: AMD Vishera FX-8350 4.0GHz 8,650
GPU: Sapphire NITRO R9-380 Dual-X OC 2GB GDDR5 9,890
MOBO: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P 4,150
RAM: Gskill RipjawsX 8GB (4×2) 2133 CL9 2,620
HDD: Seagate 1TB 7200RPM ST1000DM003 2,450
SSD: N/A N/A
PSU: Corsair VS550 2,190
CASE: Tecware Infinity 1,240

PRICE: PHP31,190

The FX-8350 is still an extremely affordable and efficient processor. Despite being 2 years old, the processor still packs a punch because of its 8-core structure accompanied with a very fast clock speed of 4.0Ghz. This means you wont have to worry about mere bottlenecks especially if you’ll be playing small or casual competitive games such as Dota 2 and CS:GO.

For the graphics card we used the Sapphire NITRO R9-380 Dual X OC Edition. The R9-380 itself is already a grand card capable of playing AAA games in high settings at 1080p with decent framerates. Its not as powerful as Nvidia’s newer Pascal graphics card line or the RX-480, but considering our budget and since its Php4,000 cheaper, it’s still a good option.

If you have a slightly bigger budget, go for the 4GB version of the r9-380. The extra 2GB of RAM will do great when playing games with large texture files. Below are videos of the R9-380’s performance.

GTA V

Dark Souls 3

Tom Clancy’s The Division

Battlefield 4

Rise of the Tomb Raider

 

Build 2:

Part Name Price
CPU: AMD Vishera FX-8320E 3.50GHz 8-Core 6,390
GPU: Sapphire RX 480 8GB GDDR5 13,800
MOBO: ASRock N68C-GS4 FX 2,350
RAM: Corsair 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz 1,850
HDD: Seagate 1TB 7200RPM ST1000DM003 2,450
SSD: N/A N/A
PSU: Corsair VS550 2,190
CASE: Tecware Infinity 1,240

PRICE: PHP30,270

The energy efficient baby brother of the FX-8350, the FX-8320E is an efficient 8-core processor running at 3.50Ghz. It is a tad slower than the FX-8350, but it is also cheaper and more power efficient. We partnered it with Sapphire’s RX 480 graphics card. Unlike the other build, we have a slower RAM due to a much cheaper motherboard to make way for the RX-480, but is sufficient enough for gaming. You won’t notice much of difference in RAM speed either way.

The FX-8320E will most likely bottleneck the card if the game is CPU extensive. Other than that, you can expect this build to run selected AAA games at High/Ultra Settings in 1080p and mixed settings at 1440p with good framerates. Below are videos of the RX-480’s performance.

The Witcher 3

Batman: Arkham Knight

Tom Clancy’s Rainbox Six Seige

Need for Speed 2015

Just Cause 3

Bottomline:

With Php30,000 you could buy yourself a decent rig that’s capable of playing any game today with decent framerates. While of course you should expect performance to degrade as years pass by due to technological advancements, with this guide we assure you that you will give you a decent gaming experience as of now.

Between the two builds I would prefer the first one due to its better motherboard, faster ram, and the R9-380 is actually sufficient enough for gaming. If you have a higher budget, even if its just Php5,000 more, choose the first build then buy yourself an RX-480. The advantage of the secondbuild compared to the first one is gaming performance out of the box thanks to the RX-480.

If you’re not sure which build to choose, here we state the differences and the advantages of each build.

  • Build 1 – FX-8350 and an R9-380
    • Best build between the two for long term upgrade. The build has better parts in almost every aspect compared to the second one.
    • Faster CPU but weaker GPU. The FX-8350 is stronger than the 8320e, but since the R9-380 is weaker than the RX-480, gaming performance will have a massive difference.
    • Choose this build if you plan on upgrading in the future. Just buy a new graphics card, or if you have a bit more money to spend, just buy an RX-480 instantly and you’ll get a significantly better performance than the second one.
  • Build 2 – FX-8320E and an RX-480

    • Only suitable for those who have little to no plans on upgrading, the FX-8320E whilst good, will bottleneck higher end cards much more than the FX-8350.
    • Gaming performance is significantly better than build 1, though with the cost of parts. This build has a cheaper motherboard, slower ram, and slower processor to make room for the RX-480.
    • Choose this build if you have little to no plans on upgrading. This is intended for those who wants to game out of the box at high settings in 1080p and even capable of 1440p thanks to the RX-480.

All in all with Php30,000 you could buy yourself a good rig that is VR Ready (R9-380 not VR ready though is capable in playing some VR Games based on experience). If you’re planning for a long term upgrade, go with the first build. But if you intend to max out everything at 1080p and have little plans on buying parts in the future, go with the second one. All in all, he hope this guide gives you an insight as to what your Php30,000 can do.

Are you looking for a cheaper rig? or a new laptop? Check out our:

We will be posting an Intel build sometime in the future.

The post Php30,000 AMD Gaming Build Guide – 2016 appeared first on YugaTech | Philippines News & Tech Reviews.