Let’s not forget Purisima

While we are riveted to the splendor of Hacienda Binay’s Kew Gardens and air-conditioned piggery, let us not forget Philippine National Police Chief Alan Purisima and his questionable acts as a public official.

PNP Chief Alan Purisima and President Aquino

PNP Chief Alan Purisima and President Aquino

The public should be more vigilant of the Purisima case because no less than President Aquino is protecting him, vouching for the Police chief’s integrity despite blatant violation of ethical standards set for government officials.

Talking with reporters in Indonesia, Aquino said, “Natuwa ako noong sinama niya lahat sa bahay niya sa Nueva Ecija. Iyon, gawain ng tao na hindi nagtatago.”

What kind of logic is that? Allowing media to see his vacation villa in a 4.5 hectare property in Nueva Ecija does not answer the questions of how he acquired it at a cheap price and how he was able to build a nice four-bedroom vacation house complete with swimming pool, gazebo and a nipa hut out of his salary as a police officer.

It is PR.

In the same way, former Vice Mayor Ernesto Mercado was out of line when he expressed sympathy for Purisima during his presentation of Vice President Jejomar Binay’s alleged 350-hectare estate in Rosario, Batangas at the Senate hearing last week.

“Kawawa naman si PNP Chief Purisima. Binabanatan ng media, 4.5 hectares lang naman ang property niya sa Nueva Ecija. Ito 350 hectares,” Mercado said.

Binay’s 350-hectare Batangas estate is mindboggling but Purisima’s 4.5 hectare vacation place is no less an anomaly if it’s proven to have been acquired illegally.

Just because one is a smaller crook does not make him not a crook. A smaller size or amount is no certification of honesty.

Aside from his Nueva Ecija property, Purisima’s conduct in the P25 million renovation of the White House in Camp Crame, the PNP chief’s official residence, also raises a lot of questions.

Sources said the White House was constructed with government money although there was no capital outlay for it in the PNP budget. It was made possible with the juggling of funds by PNP officers in charge of the agency’s finances.

When the White House renovation was being questioned by media, sources said Purisima met with his trusted officers and they agreed that the line they will give the public was: “No government money was used.”
If no government money was used, where did the P25 million for the renovation come from?

Sources said Purisima’s group had another brainstorming session and they came up with the bright idea of asking the PNP chief’s fellow Mason brothers to own up having made a donation to the PNP for the renovation of the White House.

This was not easy because lying is supposedly anathema to Freemasonry which includes Truth as one of its core principles.

One military officer who is also a Mason said they also saw a problem justifying a P25 million donation for the renovation of the White House when there were more urgent projects in the PNP like improvement of the hospital.

The group finally was able to get three contractors to agree to be identified as “donors”: Carlos Gonzales of ULTICON Builders, Alexander Lopez of Pacific Concrete Corporation, and Christopher Pastrana of CAPP Industries.
But it was a strange kind of donation consisting of “building materials” because the deeds of donation were signed only last month when the renovation had already been completed.

Purisima’s tale of the three donors also defies common sense because those three companies are based in different parts of the country. How were they coordinated as to their participation in the renovation?

News reports later revealed that although the donors did not have projects with the PNP, as Purisima stressed, two of them – Pacific Concrete Corp. and Ulticon Builders – have contracts with Department of Public Works and Highways and the Bases Conversion and Development Authority.

Purisima also had another intriguing revelation when he appeared at the hearing of Senate committee on public order and dangerous drugs committee chaired by Sen. Grace Poe. He admitted that he bought his brand-new Toyota Land Cruiser “Prado” for P1.5 million which has a published price of P4.5 million. He said a car dealer in Pampanga gave him a huge discount.

P3 million is no ordinary discount. It’s a huge favor. It’s a gift. Sen. Miriam Santiago went even further and called it “bribery.”

Plunder and indirect bribery charges have been filed against Purisima.

He is also being investigated by the Ombudsman for allegedly approving an irregular courier service contract with Werfast Documentary Agency in 2011.

Accepting gifts and donations is a violation of Republic Act No. 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act); Republic Act No. 6713 (Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees); Presidential Decree 46 (Making it Punishable for Public Officials and Employees to Receive, and for Private Persons to Give, Gifts on Any Occasion, including Christmas).

Aquino’s defense of Purisima makes a mockery of his “Tuwid na Daan” mantra.

When stupidity resulted in something good

Alyzza Agustin's post. Thanks to Topgear.
The incident involving car model Alyzza Agustin and Police Chief Superintendent Alexander Ignacio is one example of something good coming out of a stupid act.

God works in mysterious ways indeed.

Last Sept. 28, Agustin, who apparently enjoys social media but does not comprehend it’s power and perils proudly posted in her Facebook and Instagram accounts that she was able to get away violating the color coding traffic scheme in Metro Manila by using a calling card Ignacio gave her.

She bragged: “Nahuli na naman ako dahil coding but because of you Boss Alex wala ng huli-huli. Thank you so much sa napaka-useful mong card with matching dedication pa.”

She even posted the calling card of Ignacio and with a signed note at the back which said: “Please assist my EA, Alyzza Agustin.”

EA is understood to be Executive Assistant.

Of course the traffic policeman let Ignacio’s EA get away with the violation which ordinary motorists who are not the EA of any government official would not have escaped without paying a fine and undergo so many hassles.

It was a good thing Agustin didn’t realize the perils of social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram): that there’s nothing private once posted. There’s no such thing as limiting your message to your friends because the friends of your friends can share what they find interesting, intriguing, infuriating.

That’s what happened to Agustin’s post. Several netizens reacted to it because it showed misuse of authority on the part of Santiago.

President Aquino’s “no wang-wang” policy was most applauded because it was supposed to put government officials into their proper role as public servants. A government position is not supposed to be a position of privilege to be used to put officials above the long- suffering ordinary citizens.

The color coding scheme was devised to ease traffic in Metro Manila which is a daily curse to commuters and motorists. Giving one an exemption for a flimsy reason that she is a friend of an official makes a mockery of the regulation and rubs salt to the suffering of the commuters and motorists.

That’s why Agustin’s post drew collective ire.

Ignacio now denies that Agustin was his EA. So what was she?

Someone must have told Agustin what a stupid thing she did because she later deleted those posts. Too late. In social media, once posted, it’s spread (goes viral) and it cannot be recalled.

Not even her apology could undo what she did: “I would like to apologize to everyone who was affected and offended by my post: fellow motorists, Director Alexander C. Ignacio and his family, and the PNP institution as a whole. I was just overwhelmed by that moment because I was caught in traffic for hours coming from work.

I would like to make it a point that I do not know Director Alexander C. Ignacio personally. I mean no harm to anyone, and just like any Filipino motorist, I would like a little convenience on the road. Naniniwala po ako na ang bawat isa sa atin ay may pagkukulang din naman sa daan. Pasensya na po sa aking pagkakamali.”

Ignacio declared that he is “not a womanizer” and complained that his family “ including my ailing mother, is badly affected by this scandal.”

Upon arriving from Malaysia, where he attended an ASEAN Police Conference, he requested “ for private moments “with his family.

He also said he is consulting with his lawyers about filing of charges against Agustin for “moral damages caused by the calling card scandal.”

It’s so funny.

Hooray for social media!

1987 coup: The ties that bind PNoy and Purisima

President Aquino with PNP Chief Alan Purisima.

President Aquino with PNP Chief Alan Purisima.

President Aquino’s dogged defense of Police Chief Alan Purisima despite revelations of acts of irregularity and the public’s frustration over breakdown of law and order, have led many to ask what’s behind the closeness of the two.

While in New York last week, Aquino described the PNP Chief as ““not capricious.” Back in Manila after information about the luxurious Nueva Ecija vacation house with an attic on a 4.5 hectare property with a separate pavilion, separate four- car garage with quarters, a 7.5m x 15m pool, Aquino maintains the line that criticisms against his administration are really meant to block reforms that he is instituting.

It should be recalled that in order to install Purisima as PNP chief before the 2013 elections, then PNP Chief Nicanor Bartolome was forced to retire three months before his retirement age of 56.

During the turnover ceremonies from Bartolome to Purisima at Camp Crame on Dec. 18, 2012, Aquino revealed that he has known Purisima since 1987 when the latter was part of his mother’s Presidential Security Group.

'This is not a mansion. Just an ordinary house.'-Purisima's  Nueva Ecija resthouse.

‘This is not a mansion. Just an ordinary house.’-Purisima’s Nueva Ecija resthouse.


Aquino said of Purisima:”Our bonds have been tried and tested; we know that we stand by each other on the straight path, in service to our countrymen. This explains my utmost confidence that he will always side with what is right, and that he can ensure meaningful, positive change among the ranks of our police force—especially when compared to the system we inherited. “

Police and military sources said the strongest “bond” between Purisima and Aquino was the Aug. 28, 1987 coup attempt against Cory Aquino’s government where the presidential son was wounded. They said Purisima was with him in that incident.

Then Presidential Security Group Commander (and now Secretary of National Defense) Voltaire Gazmin recounted the incident for National Geographic : ”I was right there at Gate 4 when the rebel soldiers tried to enter Malacañang. The rebel troops moved in on several trucks and shooting started. The car of the President’s son, Noynoy, was intercepted by attacking rebel soldiers near St. Jude Church. Noynoy was injured, and three of his security men were killed. Other PSG troops were killed during that clash.”

Following the series of coup attempts (nine all in all) against the Cory government, a fact-finding commission was formed headed by then Comelec Commissioner Hilario Davide, Jr.

Here’s the portion on the Malacañang attack of the Davide Commission report: “At about 1:45 a.m, 28 August, the rebels launched their attack on Malacanang. Some 20 rebels ransacked the armory of the Ant-Terrorist Task Force at the PSG at the foot of Nagtahan bridge. They attacked Malacañang from two directions along Aguila and JP Laurel streets but were blocked by the PSG and CAPCOM elements deployed at all possible approached. A firefight ensued, where several men from both sides were killed or wounded.

“The V-160 under the command of rebel Capt Reynaldo Ordoñez (PMA ’78) was confronted by a Scorpion tank coming from the Malacañang area near St. Jude Church. After Ordoñez spoke with its driver, the tank withdrew and the V-160 later left for Camp Aguinaldo. The 62IB led by Ochosa arrived at the Nagtahan bridge area at 2:00 a.m. passing through La Loma. They engaged in a firefight with government troops where three of their companions were killed while two were wounded. After about 30 minutes, they too headed for Camp Aguinaldo. The men of the 14 IB led by Acosta arrived at the Ayala bridge at about 2:30 a.m. and were deployed on both ends of the bridge.

“Later, after hearing shots from the area of Malacañang, they fired three rounds of flares to signal their withdrawal to Camp Aguinaldo.

“Unable to get to Malacañang, the rest of the rebel troops under Honasan headed for Camp Aguinaldo through the Sta Mesa route. But in the course of their withdrawal, they shot at civilian onlookers who were jeering at them killing 11 and wounding 54.

“Earlier they had fired at the convoy of President Aquino’s son, Noynoy, who was rushing home to Arlegui near Malacañang. Noynoy was wounded while his bodyguard was killed. Two other people died, and a third one was seriously wounded in the car behind them. The marine reinforcement led by Biazon composed of five companies and four LVTs arrived at the Malacañang area at 4:30 a.m but the rebels had by them withdrawn to Camp Aguinaldo.”

Aquino relates to media the Aug. 28, 1987 clash with rebel soldiers.

Aquino relates to media the Aug. 28, 1987 clash with rebel soldiers.

The years and his ascendancy in Malacañang as president have not completely healed the wound (actually one of the five bullets is still embedded in his neck) that incident had caused on Aquino. In March 2013, in General Santos City, while he was condemning the Datu Lahad, Sabah siege by the forces of the late Jamalul Kiram III, Aquino confused the audience when he suddenly shifted to the 1987 coup. He said: “Pasensiya na ho kayo kung may halong emosyon ‘yung talumpati ko sa inyo ngayon. Talagang, alam ho niyo, na-ambush nga ako noong ‘87 po. Tatlo sa apat kong kasamahan patay.”

We are wondering, if three of Aquino’s companions died, was the fourth one who survived Purisima?
There were rumors that a woman , who was in the car with Aquino during that incident, was one of the three persons killed.

The late broadcaster/blogger Ding Gagelonia had written about this rumor in his blog “At Midfield” on Sept. 27, 2009. The blog entry carried a press statement from Florencio “Butch” Abad, then campaign manager of presidential candidate Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III refuting what he denounced as “ malicious allegations” that appeared in a newspaper.

Abad said it was “ an old story” and the reporter “got the facts completely wrong. “

He said: “A certain ‘Charlotte Marie Datiles’” indeed died during the August 28, 1987 coup d’etat. She was not the girlfriend of Senator Benigno “Noynoy” S. Aquino III nor was she in the same car as the senator.”
Abad quoted from a September 9, 1987 Inquirer column Ramon Tulfo saying that Datiles “ was the 19-year-old girlfriend of a certain Lt. Teodoro Sanchez, an undercover operative of the Intelligence Service of the Armed Forces of the Philippines.”

Bad said according to Tulfo, “Sanchez and Datiles and another ISAFP agent were passing by Malacañang aboard a car during the attack on the palace. They came from a mission following up a lead in the slaying of Local Government Secretary Jaime Ferrer. Sanchez’s car was sandwiched between the Palace guards and the rebels firing at each other.”

Abad closed his statement with “While we all expect evil propaganda of this nature to continue as the election nears, we have no doubt that truth will prevail in the end. We must not be distracted in the campaign to fight for what is right. The Filipino people deserve nothing less. Our call remains: ‘Tanggaling ang tiwali, itama ang mali!’

The relevance of Abad’s call has become more sharp and urgent in the wake of controversies involving the President’s men.

PNP warns misbehaving cops caught on social media

The Philippine National Police (PNP) have recently issued a memo regarding its officers who are captured in social media violating PNP rules and regulations and traffic laws.

pnp twitter

The PNP issued a memorandum titled “PNP Personnel Violations Reported and Captured in the Social Media” which calls to attention police officers who “do not set the best examples when in public view and while performing their duties.” Some police officers have been exposed on social media with the following alleged violations:

* Improper use of vehicle plates;
* Non-compliance to Tamang Bihis policy;
* Non-wearing of helmets while riding motorcycle;
* Improver use of government vehicle;
* Violation of Traffic Rules; and
* Non-observance of discipline while on duty

According to the memo, the PNP should be the first to uphold the law and promote the culture of professionalism as stated in CODE-P. It also stressed that if the concerns are not properly addressed the PNP “will be mocked in the public and in the media due to the irresponsibility of the very few PNP personnel.”

Police Chief Superintendent, Danilo Santos Constantino, warned that “immediate heads of offices will be held liable for the violation of their personnel on the above-stated polices if no action is taken to the misdemeanors of their personnel.”

{source}

The post PNP warns misbehaving cops caught on social media appeared first on YugaTech | Philippines, Tech News & Reviews.

PNP warns misbehaving cops caught on social media

The Philippine National Police (PNP) have recently issued a memo regarding its officers who are captured in social media violating PNP rules and regulations and traffic laws.

pnp twitter

The PNP issued a memorandum titled “PNP Personnel Violations Reported and Captured in the Social Media” which calls to attention police officers who “do not set the best examples when in public view and while performing their duties.” Some police officers have been exposed on social media with the following alleged violations:

* Improper use of vehicle plates;
* Non-compliance to Tamang Bihis policy;
* Non-wearing of helmets while riding motorcycle;
* Improver use of government vehicle;
* Violation of Traffic Rules; and
* Non-observance of discipline while on duty

According to the memo, the PNP should be the first to uphold the law and promote the culture of professionalism as stated in CODE-P. It also stressed that if the concerns are not properly addressed the PNP “will be mocked in the public and in the media due to the irresponsibility of the very few PNP personnel.”

Police Chief Superintendent, Danilo Santos Constantino, warned that “immediate heads of offices will be held liable for the violation of their personnel on the above-stated polices if no action is taken to the misdemeanors of their personnel.”

{source}

The post PNP warns misbehaving cops caught on social media appeared first on YugaTech | Philippines, Tech News & Reviews.