Looting the Marcos loot

Imelda Marcos loves jewelry. Photo from http://imeldific2012.blogspot.com/2012/09/imelda-marcos-muse-of-manila-iron.html

Just because the Presidential Commission on Good Government would be abolished, it doesn’t mean that the hunt for the people’s money looted by the Marcoses and hidden in bank accounts abroad or in properties under the name of some friends, should also end.

As PCGG Chair Andres Bautista said, the job could be continued by the Department of Justice. The reasons he gave, one of which as that Marcos- loot- hunting by the 200-man agency is no longer cost effective, makes sense.

So far, in its 27-year existence the PCGG has recovered $4 billion (P164 billion), only a tiny fraction of what was estimated to be a $10 billion loot in 1986. Just imagine how much the unrecovered would be worth by now including the interests.

The executive order creating the PCGG was the first issued by President Cory Aquino on Feb. 28, 1986, three days after the Marcos fled early evening of Feb. 25, 1986 as millions of Filipinos rose in a bloodless revolution called People Power.

The PCGG was supposed to prevent the Marcos from spiriting money and other forms of wealth they had stashed during the more than 20 years that they were in power. The creation of the PCGG was the basis by the Swiss Federal Court to freeze some of the accounts identified to belong to the Marcoses.

The PCGG may have lost its luster by now, the fault of abuses and incompetence not only by its personnel but also by a number of the people who when placed in power post-Marcos turned out to be as greedy and corrupt.

One of the stories I remember was, as the Marcoses were rushing out of the Malacañang to the waiting helicopter parked at the Pangarap House grounds that would bring them to Clark Air Base where a C-130 was waiting that would bring them to Guam and to Hawaii, some of the documents and pearls fell on the floor while they were hastily stuffed in luggage. Two of those documents later turned out to be the “smoking gun” evidence that led to the recovery of the four buildings in New York worth $350 million.

The Bernstein Declaration of Trust: the smoking gun


The documents were the declarations of trust handwritten by Joseph E. Bernstein on a Manila Peninsula letterhead. The first declaration of trust dated April 4, 1982 stated that Bernstein, a New York real estate broker, would act as trustee for former president Marcos with respect to Lastura Corp. N.V., a corporation registered in Netherlands Antilles.

The second declaration of trust, dated April 5, 1982 stated that Bernstein was the trustee of Beneficio Investment Inc., a corporation registered in Panama which in turn owned Lastura Corp.

With the smoking gun evidence, the Bernstein brothers, Joseph and Ralph, admitted having fronted for the Marcoses in the purchase of the New York buildings.

But there were also accounts of looting of the loot in Malacañang of some members of the so-called yellow group.

One of the intriguing testimonies of Dr. Teresita Reyes, dermatologist of Margarita “Tingting” Cojuangco, wife of Jose “Peping” Cojuangco, brother of Cory Aquino, during the 1991 trial in New York of the racketeering case against former First Lady Imelda Marcos, was about several Louis Vuitton valises containing jewelry that they took out from the bedroom of Imelda.

The valises were loaded into vans that drove to Reyes’ house in Dasmariñas Village in Makati.
Some members of the Reformed the Armed Forces Movement who saw the loading of the valises in the van reported to then Defense Minister Juan Ponce-Enrile, who led with Philippine Constabulary Chief Fidel Ramos,the coup de’etat against Marcos.

Enrile reportedly went to the Dasmariñas destination of the valises and saw the society matrons excitedly, like kids, trying Imelda’s jewelry.

Those jewelry (no one’s sure if everything was accounted for) are now with the Central Bank and referred to as the Malacañang collection. The Philippine government has been negotiation with the U.S. auction house, Christie’s.

Last November, there was a story in the New York Times about Imelda’s former aide, Vilma Bautista, accused of art theft. She was caught trying to sell off painting by the masters that used to be in the building occupied by Imelda Marcos. One of the painting she was able to sell was “Le Bassin aux Nymphéas” (1899) by Claude Monet to a London gallery for $32 million in September 2010.

A lot of those unrecovered Marcos ill-gotten wealth are out there, if not in banks, in the hands of some people. They cannot stay hidden forever.

We hope they would surface and returned to the Filipino people in our lifetime.

Huwag lagyan ng malisya ang litrato ni Teddy Casiño at Imelda Marcos

No collaboration.Teddy Casiño and Imelda Marcos in the 2009 birthday party of Armida Siguion-Reyna and her son, Carlitos.

Tatlong kaibigan ang nagsabi sa akin na kumakalat daw ang litrato ni Rep. Teddy Casiño sa internet na kasama si Imelda Marcos at binibigyan ng masamang kahulugan.

Para bang nakipagsabwatan si Teddy sa mga Marcos na siyang nagpahirap sa mga sinasabi nating “maka-kaliwa” o nga nationalist na katulad ni teddy at ang mga nauna sa kanya na katulad nina dating Bayan Muna Rep. Satur Ocampo.

Ang litrato nay an ay galing sa isang post sa aking blog:
http://www.ellentordesillas.com/2009/11/05/armida-and-son-carlitos-birthday-party/

Malisyoso naman ang ganung anggulo.

Ang artikulo ay tungkol sa birthday party nina Armida Siguion-Reyna, kilala sa kanyang programa sa television na “Aawitan Kita” at ang kanyang anak, director ng pelikula na si Carlitos, noong 2009.

Pareho kasi ng birthday si Armida at si Carlitos (Nobyembre 5) at nung taon na yun, malaki ang party sa White Space Exhibition Hall sa Pasong Tamo, Makati.

Sa party kasi ni Armida at Carlitos, iba-iba ang kulay ng mga bisita na nagpapakita lamang na nakikipagsalamuha si Armida sa iba’t-ibang klase ng tao. May mahira, may mayaman. Maraming bisita ang dumarating sakay ng magagarang kotse. Meron din katulad ko, naka-taksi.

Marami siempre ang sa showbiz dahil nasa pelikula, television at musika sila. Marami rin ang nasa pulitika dahil aktibo naman talaga silang mag-ina, lalo na si Armida, sa mga isyu para sa bayan na sakop ng pulitika.

Naala-ala ko nahuli dumating si Imelda Marcos nun at halos wala nang maupuan. Nakita ni Bibeth na may bakante doon sa mesa nina Teddy Casiño kaya doon niya pina-upo si Imelda. Hindi naman magkatabi. Magkaharap sila.

Natawa nga marami. Halatang hindi kumportable si Teddy. Siempre, pambihira ang sitwasyun na yan kaya ko kinunan ng litrato.

Walang sabwatan doon. Hindi ko nga alam kung nag-usap sila ni Imelda maliban sa bati, dahil maggkaharap nga.

Noong nakaraang Linggo, birthday party ulit ni Armida at Carlitos. Ang ganda at elegante ni Armida sa edad na 82. Si Carlitos, 55, sa background lang siya at ang star talaga ay ang ina niya.

Mas maliit ang party noong Linggo kung ikumpara noong 2009.

Heto na naman ang litratuhan. Kasama ko sa mesa ang mga writers na nagpu-protesta laban sa provision ng libel sa Cybercrime Law. Nang dumating si Sen. Tito Sotto (nandun din si dating Pangulong Joseph Estrada at Senate President Juan Ponce-Enrile), sabi namin mag-pakuha kami ng litrato. Si Sotto kasi ay may pakana ng provision ng libel sa Cybercrime law.

Kaya lang, sabi ko baka ma-Teddy Casiño na naman tayo ay sabihin naki-pagsabwatan tayo.

Sabi ng isa, “Sige na pakuha tayo. May caption na ako: ‘The bully and the bullied.’”

Tanong ng isang guest, “Bakit binu-bully ka ba ni Sotto?”

Sagot ng writer, “Hindi. Ako ang nagbu-bully sa kanya.”

Sayang nga at hindi magamit ang caption na yun dahil sa sobra naming kudakan, hindi namin ang pag-alis ni Sotto at kanyang asawang si Helen Gamboa.