Agonizing moments at the DFA over Sabah

Malaysia arrests Filipinos Photo By BAZUKI MUHAMMAD REUTERS Wed, Mar 6, 2013 From Yahoo.

Malaysia arrests Filipinos Photo By BAZUKI MUHAMMAD REUTERS Wed, Mar 6, 2013 From Yahoo.

When some 30 concerned citizens met before the Holy Week to discuss the appeal to the United Nations for help for Filipinos in Sabah who are being maltreated by Malaysian authorities, they decided they would do it as private citizens and not waste their time getting the support of the Philippine government.

Of course, the petition would have carried more weight if it were the government seeking international intervention for its people, which should be the case because the government exists for its people.

In fact, it is in the Constitution’s Declaration of Principles and State Policies that (Art. II, Sec. 4) The prime duty of the Government is to serve and protect the people.”

But how can they involve the government when President Aquino has shown deep hostility towards Jamalul Kiram III and his followers, whom he blames for igniting the clashes in Sabah which are now displacing thousands of Filipinos. Reports have placed the dead to 60.

The people who were in that meeting discussed with extreme puzzlement and deep pain Aquino’s cavalier attitude towards the “loss” of the letters of Kiram III, who claims to be the current Sultan of Sulu, requesting for a meeting with him and his combative warning of “Surrender now without conditions” to Kiram’s followers.

They took note that while Malacañang was quick to respond to UN statements on international issues including the threat of North Korea, it ignored the March 6 call of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon urging all parties involved in the Sabah crisis to stop the violence and start dialogue for a peaceful resolution.

Kiram III ordered his forces in Lahad Datu to enforce a unilateral ceasefire. Malaysia rejected the call. Malacañang’s response? Deadma.

Many are wondering where is the Department of Foreign Affairs in this mess that involves relations with a fellow member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations?

DFAThese are trying times for people in the DFA.

Four days after Ban Ki-moon’s call, the DFA issued a statement expressing “grave concern ….on the alleged rounding up of community members of Suluk/Tausug descent in Lahad Datu and other areas in Sabah and the alleged violations of human rights reported in the media by some Filipinos who arrived in Sulu and Tawi-Tawi from Sabah.”

That was a Sunday. We learned from a reliable source that a few hours after DFA issued that statement, Presidential Spokesman Edwin Lacierda called up Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario and told him about the President’s displeasure over his statement on the reported violations by Malaysian authorities of the human rights of Filipinos.

Del Rosario told Lacierda that if the President no longer has confidence on him, he is willing to resign. We don’t know if Lacierda relayed Del Rosario’s reply to the President.

Four days after, when asked about the lack of action by the Philippines against Malaysia, DFA Spokesman Raul Hernandez said the burden of proof on the reported human rights violations by Malaysian authorities against Filipinos should be on media who reported it.

Hah???

Hernandez is a competent foreign service officer and we sympathize with him that he is forced to mouth those senseless lines.

We’d like to remind those who told him to say that, that media’s role is to report as accurately as we can what needs to be reported. It is not our job to gather evidence that would be used in court. That’s the job of the government and it has the resources and the manpower to do that, if it wants to.

We sympathize with the DFA officers who had to suffer the mocking attitude of the Malaysian ambassador every time they delivered a note verbale regarding access to Filipinos in Sabah. We doubt if Del Rosario ever submitted to Malacañang the recommendation given to him by his officers that they can take Malaysia to the UN for the maltreatment of Filipinos in Sabah. They said the reported bombing in Lahad Datu was a “disproportionate use of force” which is against international humanitarian law.

The recommendation included a warning on the effect of that move to the peace talks with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front that is being brokered by Malaysia.

The result of that pre-Holy Week meeting by concerned citizens was the filing today with the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navanethem Pillay and UN High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres, both based in Geneva, Switzerland separate appeals for them to “urgently intervene so that Malaysia will respect the human rights of the Filipinos in Sabah, recognized under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.”

The signatories include civil society groups led by the Concerned Citizens Movement, CenterLaw, Bagong Alyansang Makabayan, and Anakbayan.

Among the individual signatories are human rights lawyer Harry Roque, activist nun Sr. Mary John Mananzan, whistleblower Rodolfo “Jun” Lozada, journalist Vergel Santos, and political strategist Pastor Saycon, who serves as adviser to Jamalul Kiram III, one of the heirs of the Sultan of Sulu.

Are we ready for Wearable Technology?

We’ve been so engrossed with smartphones, tablets and several other consumer technologies. In fact, some of current tech seems to be overkill already – such as 1080p displays on a 5-inchsmartphone and multi-core CPUs in which platforms aren’t even fully optimized for yet. As time goes, manufacturers look to other elements to perfect and now they’re looking a good look at wearable tech; are we ready?

are we ready

Personally, I do want manufacturers to perfect the smartphone before they look elsewhere. I might have even said that next year could be the year of smartphone cameras as I really like the idea of HTC’s UltraPixel, Nokia’s PureView and Sony’s Exmor RS — they focus on quality/technology over just plain megapixel count (Google’s next Nexus phone is rumored to have a great camera as well).

Moreover, we feel like these companies are looking at something more as each one are confirming that they’re working on something else other than a smartphone or a tablet – specifically a smartwatch.

smartwatch

Samsung has already confirmed that they are working on a smartwatch, while companies such as LG, Apple and Google were reported to be working on one too. This isn’t the first time someone’s making an intelligent wristwatch, as gadgets like the Motorola MotoACTV and the Sony Smartwatch are already available for purchase now. Why the excitement then?

A recent report from analysts say that the time is ripe for smartwatches. If we make that a given, we still can’t deny the fact that companies aren’t only working on smartwatches – but also on other gadgets that you wear. Google already has Glasses for next year, and just recently, they just showcased a talking shoe. Over at the gaming zone, Oculus VR already has the Rift – a head-mounted virtual reality gaming device which is currently being funded and developed.

But let’s get back to the consumer. Do we really need a watch just to check on our notifications when we can just pull out the phone out of our pockets? Or a pair of glasses to take photos when you have a more capable camera lurking in your bag? Above everything else, would it appeal to 3rd-world countries such as the Philippines? Leave your comment and opinion below.

The post Are we ready for Wearable Technology? appeared first on YugaTech | Philippines, Tech News & Reviews.

App in Focus: Photoplay for Android

There’s a new kid in the block that goes by the name of Photoplay and is looking to take on the king of the hill Instagram and be the next big thing in the app industry. Let’s see what this new photo-sharing app has to offer in our full review after the break.

photoplay for android

The App Store and Google Play Store (maybe even other app marketplace) is filled with apps which serve as an alternative to the popular photo-sharing app Instagram. Though many have attempted, none was note-worthy enough to capture the attention of the mobile shutterbugs. That is until Photoplay comes around.

Introduction

Photoplay is a free photo-sharing app that has recently made its debut on App Store, Google Play Store and Windows Marketplace (Windows Phone 7.x for the meantime). Now it may not be that big of deal for some, but the fact that the app made a simultaneous launch on three of the biggest mobile platform to date is a remarkable feat by itself.

registration

Signing up with Photoplay is rather easy. Users can create an account using their existing Twitter or Facebook account. If you have neither of the two (which I highly doubt), you can register using your email address and filling out the required field such as Name and Password.

Interface

After completing the registration, you’ll be greeted with a straightforward dashboard with 5 tabs at the bottom. These buttons’ function, even their respective placements, are identical to that on Instagram. This is a bit disappointing as the developers could’ve come up with something more creative. On the positive note though, it makes it easier for existing IG users to find their way on the new app.

interface

Although these buttons serve the same purpose as those on IG, there are some minor differences on the layout and features. The most significant dissimilarity can be found on the “Discover” (second from the left) and “Camera” (middle) tabs.

The Discover tab is divided in to two sections namely “Top Liked” and “On Map”. The former has three sub-categories that show users pictures with most likes from “Friends”, on a certain “City” and/or from all users under “Everything”.

discover

On Map, on the other hand, is similar to IG’s Photo Map feature which allows users to view geotagged picture on a map. However, instead of showing images per user, On Map shows all the pictures that were geotagged by a Photoplay user.

Now let’s go to the Camera tab. Instead of going straight to the phone’s camera app, users are asked if they want to “Take Photo” or “Choose from Library”. We’re really not a fan of this alteration as it may hinder users from capturing blink-of-an-eye moments because of this added press.

camera1

Fortunately, this slight drawback is evened out by the other features of the camera app. Once you’ve snapped or selected a photo from your gallery, you have an option to select from the three available frames; Vertical, Square and Horizontal. Just to set things clear, the frame that we’re talking about is not the fancy borders you can apply on you image, rather it’s the cropping of the image.

So instead of being limited to a resizable square frame, Photoplay allows images to be framed more appropriately and gives it users more control over their image.

camera2

In addition to framing, the app also has some minor editing features to the further enhance the picture. At the top are four buttons namely Rotate, Vignette, Blur and Brightness/Saturation.

There’s a drop down button at the bottom for Filters which opens up 8 filters (no fancy names, just numbers) that you can apply to your image. Other than its simplicity, we also liked how each filter shows a preview of the image itself after it is applied, instead of generic hot air balloon photos on different hue.

upload

The next window is where users add some information about the picture such as description, location and tags. It also provides users with control over the comments and who can view the image being uploaded.

On the same window, users can also share their snaps on Twitter and Facebook by ticking on the respective icon. If left unticked, the image will only be posted on Photoplay.

What’s missing?

Being a fairly young app, there are some aspects of Photoplay that still needs to be improved on its next version. Here are some of the things we wished to be included on the future builds.

• Deeper integration on the device. Photoplay is not listed under the “Share” options inside the Android Gallery app which would’ve made it easier for users to upload pictures. Also, the app failed notified us when someone liked or commented on our post.
• Integration with other social networking sites. Currently, Facebook, Twitter and VR.com (a Russian SNS) are the only three SNS that users can share their uploads.
• Interface upgrades:
> Orientation. The can only be viewed on portrait as of the moment.
> The interface doesn’t have an option to share/reshare previously uploaded pictures to supported SNS. Matter of fact, the only selection available under “Option” is to delete the uploaded picture.
> Ability to download uploaded pictures.
> THERE’S NO SEARCH BUTTON?! The only search feature is “Search Photo” under Profile tab which is also useless at times.
• Stability. The app crashed a handful of times with no error codes and it automatically signed us out when it does.

Conclusion

I’ve been using Photoplay for the past few days, and I must say that it’s one of the more decent free alternatives to Instagram. Although most of the features of this app remained heavily influenced by Instagram, I really like the additional functionalities on the Camera and Discover tabs.

photoplay

In our opinion, Photoplay still has a long way to go even be in the same league as Instagram, let alone take its position as the go-to-app for photo-sharing. However, it’s off to a great start and we think that with proper financial backing, Photoplay has the potential to be one of top alternatives to IG.

You can try out Photoplay by clicking on the respective links for your platform.

Photoplay for iOS
Photoplay for Windows Phone
Photoplay for Android

The post App in Focus: Photoplay for Android appeared first on YugaTech | Philippines, Tech News & Reviews.

I’d Like to Leave the Catholic Church, Please

Dear Catholic Church,

I am writing to let you know that as of today, I have decided to defect from the Catholic Church and renounce Catholicism entirely. I know that short of excommunication, there’s actually no way to formally leave the Catholic church, but humor me. After 27 years, it’s time I start getting serious about my spirituality and come clean about what I really believe in – or don’t believe in.

Like most Filipinos, I was baptized a Roman Catholic long before I could speak, and was raised by its doctrines, customs, and mythology through my family and private education. I don’t blame my parents at all for baptizing me Catholic. It’s just what people in the Philippines do to give their kids a moral compass, social acceptance, and a safety net from Limbo in case we die in childhood. School actually had more to do with raising me Catholic. Aside from the occasional Sunday mass, a few bedtime prayers, and some gruesome books on the lives of the saints, religion didn’t figure much into my family life.

Still, I don’t think my parents will be too thrilled to discover my defection from the Church, and I hope I’m not disappointing them terribly by formally rejecting the religion of my birth. The truth is that I have never really taken Catholicism very seriously, not even as a child. I mean, I had my first communion illegally at six years old because I wanted to know what the wafer tasted like.

The only time I remember being a “good” Catholic was when I was 11 and read the book of Revelations for the first time. I took the entire thing literally and was gripped by a very strong and irrational fear of enduring these horrors as punishment for being a bad Catholic. I was also aware that I wasn’t worthy of God’s Kingdom – not because I was being humble or whatever, but because religion was a thing I did, thoughtlessly and with little sincerity. The time to repent was nigh! For the next couple of weeks, I attended mass as often as twice a week, and prayed the rosary every night because I read somewhere that the Virgin Mary saved good little girls who behaved well. Then I cried myself to sleep because deep down I knew that I was just doing all of this in order to save my own sorry ass, and maybe that’s not enough to win you passage to heaven.

I am telling you these to illustrate the first reason for my defection: the only things that kept me in the Church was fear and guilt. Catholicism and all its rituals and doctrines was not something I could identify with, no matter how hard I tried. But I proclaimed my love for Jesus God in public anyway, not only to avoid Hell in the afterlife, but to avoid the Hell of Social Rejection right here on Earth.

Seventh grade and high school was spent at a small, very religious all-girls school run by Augustinian Recollect nuns. There I learned that people who don’t know how to say the rosary are a social anomaly to be made fun of, because what kind of horrible, hell-bound person doesn’t know what all those beads are for? The school’s brand of Christian Living Education involved show-offy religious ceremonies under the sun, strict body policing in the name of simplicity and modesty, and lengthy retreats designed to make you feel lower than a worm for committing very normal, very human “sins” and treating Jesus like some sort of prayer dumpster that you only pay attention to when you need something. There were no intelligent discussions about Catholicism in here, only “believe in what I say” lectures and threats of eternal damnation for not believing enough. The distance between me and the Church grew rapidly in the years I spent at this school. Ironically, this was also the point in time where I probably said the most prayers.

My reasons for leaving the Church are more personal than political, but I would be remiss if I didn’t address how the lack of separation between Church and State continued drive me away from Catholicism. Where do I begin? Their continued efforts to delay the implementation of the Reproductive Health Law and demonize its supporters had a lot to do with it. The whole reproductive rights debate made it clear that the Church is more interested in maintaining their influence and power over Filipinos than improving the quality of our lives. It feels wrong to be part of a Church that doesn’t care about preventing maternal deaths, reducing the spread of AIDS, and making effective birth control methods available to families who otherwise can’t afford them.

The heart of the matter is that the Philippines has weak political institutions and a wealthy Church that’s only too eager to exploit these weaknesses to maintain their influence and political power in this country. I can’t speak for others, but to me, staying Catholic means that I’m okay with all these celibate old men telling us who to vote for, what kind of people should get married, and that it’s fine for elephants to die so their tusks can be fashioned into valuable religious paraphernalia.

I suppose now is a good time to bring up my thoughts on God’s existence. Am I an atheist, you ask? Is this why I’m leaving the Church? In college I thought I was, but I think I’m more agnostic than anything. I’m not 100% convinced that there is no God, but I haven’t seen any real proof that he’s out there either. God or no, I’m going to live my life as though he weren’t there.

I don’t want to debate about whether or not God exists, because that’s not what this is about. I am leaving the Church because I no longer believe in any of its doctrines, teachings, and rituals, nor do I much respect it as an institution. I want to figure out my own spirituality without old fogeys in the Vatican and the CBCP telling me what to do, think, and believe in. I am leaving the Church because they have kept the Philppines in the Dark Ages long enough and I’m tired of pretending to support them for the sake of social acceptance. I want to be a good person, not out of fear of the afterlife, but because I want to make a positive difference and be one less asshole here on Earth. I don’t know where I’m going to go after this, or what philosophies will make up my new moral compass, but I won’t be turning to organized religion for guidance anymore.

This isn’t exactly goodbye, though. You may still occasionally see me in Church, standing up and sitting down as required at weddings, Christmas mass, and funerals. I will be attending these ceremonies not because I want to, but because I choose my battles. Sometimes it’s less exhausting to participate in religious rituals than to expect others to adjust to your unpopular beliefs.

I draw the line at having a Catholic wedding, though. If I ever get married, it will not be officiated by some celibate dude who is denied the very sacrament he is performing, and my wedding guests will have to deal with it.

Sincerely,
Lauren Dado, apostate

Cover image source

A nice flying experience with SEAIR

It was my first time to fly with SEAIR during my recent trip to Hong Kong. I haven’t even flown domestic with them. The amiable PR, Jingjing Romero, assured me “no air pockets!” and true enough, the experience I had was smooth and pleasant. It helped that weather conditions were good too.

flyseair

SEAIR uses the Airbus A320 for its regional flights to Southeast Asia. It has the official tourism slogan More Fun in the Philippines proudly emblazoned in its body.

SEAIR as a low cost carrier has a tie-up with Tiger Airways (in fact, I think Tiger owns the former already). So if you’re trying to book online for cheap flights to HK, Singapore, or Bangkok, you can do so either at the flyseair.com or Tiger Airways website. We’ve looked around and this airline comes out the cheapest for last-minute bookings to Hong Kong (around $100-$150, inclusive of taxes)… even beating Air Asia, Cebu Pacific or Dragon Air. But if you’re like me and coming from Manila, the only disadvantage is that you’ll be flying out of the Diosdado Macapagal International Airport in Pampanga which is two hours away!

With their mini skirts, we think SEAIR stewardesses have the best va-va-view among the flight attendants in town. Raise if your hands if you agree! It takes a slim body and long legs to pull off this one, and she did! :)

inside @flyseair

Anyway, I think I will always be flying Filipino-owned airlines (even if low-cost) because I believe that Philippine pilots are the best! A friend thinks it all comes from their local training of dealing with all kinds of runways – some short or hilly or dangerous.

Going home from Hong Kong to Manila, our flight was a bit delayed by almost an hour but it seems that the pilot made up for it by flying home in one hour 20 minutes…. would you believe??!!

Until the next flight! :)